-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix incomplete diagnostic notes when closure returns conflicting for genric type #84244
fix incomplete diagnostic notes when closure returns conflicting for genric type #84244
Conversation
r? @estebank (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit af90cac has been approved by |
LL | Foo(()) | ||
| ^^ expected integer, found `()` | ||
| | ||
note: return type inferred to be `{integer}` here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not really the 'return type' that's being inferred here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I missed that, thanks. I will fix it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't it either be "return type inferred to be Foo<{integer}>
here" with span of Foo(0)
indicated; or else "{integer}
inferred here" (with the span of 0
indicated)? (My personal view, FWIW, is that the former is a tad more informative but either seems fine).
As it is, it's a bit confusing: essentially "{integer}
inferred here" but Foo(0)
indicated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have some issue to solve this I am not sure how do do it. I found that the suggestions is emitted from
compiler\rustc_typeck\src\check\fn_ctxt\checks.rs: check_argument_types
compiler\rustc_typeck\src\check\demand.rs: demand_coerce
compiler\rustc_typeck\src\check\demand.rs: demand_coerce_diag
compiler\rustc_typeck\src\check\demand.rs: emit_coerce_suggestions
is there a way to get the return type from the FnCtxt ?
…-suggest, r=estebank fix incomplete diagnostic notes when closure returns conflicting for genric type fixes rust-lang#84128 Correctly report the span on for conflicting return type in closures
…-suggest, r=estebank fix incomplete diagnostic notes when closure returns conflicting for genric type fixes rust-lang#84128 Correctly report the span on for conflicting return type in closures
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
…pan, r=lcnr Avoid pointing out `return` span if it has nothing to do with type error This code: ```rust fn f(_: String) {} fn main() { let x = || { if true { return (); } f(""); }; } ``` Emits this: ``` Compiling playground v0.0.1 (/playground) error[E0308]: mismatched types --> src/main.rs:8:11 | 8 | f(""); | ^^- help: try using a conversion method: `.to_string()` | | | expected struct `String`, found `&str` | note: return type inferred to be `String` here --> src/main.rs:6:20 | 6 | return (); | ^^ ``` Specifically, that note has nothing to do with the type error in question. This is because the change implemented in rust-lang#84244 tries to point out the `return` span on _any_ type coercion error within a closure that happens after a `return` statement, regardless of if the error has anything to do with it. This is really easy to trigger -- just needs a closure (or an `async`) and an early return (or any other form, e.g. `?` operator suffices) -- and super distracting in production codebases. I'm letting rust-lang#84128 regress because that issue is much harder to fix correctly, and I can re-open that issue after this lands. As a drive-by, I added a `resolve_vars_if_possible` to the coercion error logic, which leads to some error improvements. Unrelated to the issue above, though.
fixes #84128
Correctly report the span on for conflicting return type in closures